Vanarsdale v. Richards

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Vanarsdale v. Richards

1 Whart. 408, 1836 Pa. LEXIS 209

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 12, 1836

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1 Whart. 408 (Vanarsdale v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vanarsdale v. Richards, 1 Whart. 408, 1836 Pa. LEXIS 209 (Pa. 1836).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trust involved in this assignment, is peculiarly a subject of equitable cognizance; and though an actual want of chancery powers might compel us to sustain an action at law in the first instance, it does not follow, that a cestui que trust shall not [410]*410be thrown on his equitable resources, where such have been provided for him. We consider the point to have been already decided.

Mr. Randall took nothing by his motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The trust involved in this assignment, is peculiarly a subject of equitable cognizance; and though an actual want of chancery powers might compel us to sustain an action at law in the first instance, it does not follow, that a cestui que trust shall not [410]*410be thrown on his equitable resources, where such have been provided for him. We consider the point to have been already decided.

Mr. Randall took nothing by his motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Whart. 408, 1836 Pa. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanarsdale-v-richards-pa-1836.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack