Vanarsdale v. Andrews

Appellate Court of Illinois

Vanarsdale v. Andrews

7 Ill. App. 199, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 198

DecidedSeptember 29, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Ill. App. 199 (Vanarsdale v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vanarsdale v. Andrews, 7 Ill. App. 199, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 198 (Ill. Ct. App. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record in this case is in such condition, that we cannot reach the merits of the controversy.

It appears from the transcript that the court regularly convened on the day fixed by law for the commencement of the term, but aside from this we cannot learn on what day of the month or of the term the judgment was rendered, only from the recital in the appeal bond. • Forty days were given in which to file a bill of exceptions. There appears in the transcript a paper purporting to be a hill of exceptions, but it bears neither date nor file-mark, nor is there any recital of the clerk that it ever was filed, and the same.is without the seal of the judge who tried the case.

There being no proper bill of exceptions in the record the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record in this case is in such condition, that we cannot reach the merits of the controversy.

It appears from the transcript that the court regularly convened on the day fixed by law for the commencement of the term, but aside from this we cannot learn on what day of the month or of the term the judgment was rendered, only from the recital in the appeal bond. • Forty days were given in which to file a bill of exceptions. There appears in the transcript a paper purporting to be a hill of exceptions, but it bears neither date nor file-mark, nor is there any recital of the clerk that it ever was filed, and the same.is without the seal of the judge who tried the case.

There being no proper bill of exceptions in the record the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Ill. App. 199, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanarsdale-v-andrews-illappct-1880.