VanAlstyne v. Whalen

495 N.E.2d 837, 398 Mass. 1004, 1986 Mass. LEXIS 1445
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided August 4, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This case comes before us following our allowance of the plaintiff’s application for further appellate review. We agree with the reasoning and conclusion of the Appeals Court. See VanAlstyne v. Whalen, 20 Mass. App. Ct. 239 (1985). We need add nothing. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial on damages.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VanAlstyne v. Whalen, 495 N.E.2d 837, 398 Mass. 1004, 1986 Mass. LEXIS 1445 (Mass. 1986).

495 N.E.2d 837 (VanAlstyne v. Whalen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. O'Neill
817 P.2d 500 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1991)