VanAlstyne v. Whalen
495 N.E.2d 837, 398 Mass. 1004, 1986 Mass. LEXIS 1445
This text of 495 N.E.2d 837 (VanAlstyne v. Whalen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
VanAlstyne v. Whalen, 495 N.E.2d 837, 398 Mass. 1004, 1986 Mass. LEXIS 1445 (Mass. 1986).
Opinion
This case comes before us following our allowance of the plaintiff’s application for further appellate review. We agree with the reasoning and conclusion of the Appeals Court. See VanAlstyne v. Whalen, 20 Mass. App. Ct. 239 (1985). We need add nothing. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial on damages.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. O'Neill
817 P.2d 500 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
495 N.E.2d 837, 398 Mass. 1004, 1986 Mass. LEXIS 1445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanalstyne-v-whalen-mass-1986.