VanAlstyne v. Whalen
495 N.E.2d 837, 398 Mass. 1004, 1986 Mass. LEXIS 1445
Opinion
This case comes before us following our allowance of the plaintiff’s application for further appellate review. We agree with the reasoning and conclusion of the Appeals Court. See VanAlstyne v. Whalen, 20 Mass. App. Ct. 239 (1985). We need add nothing. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial on damages.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
VanAlstyne v. Whalen, 495 N.E.2d 837, 398 Mass. 1004, 1986 Mass. LEXIS 1445 (Mass. 1986).
495 N.E.2d 837 (VanAlstyne v. Whalen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. O'Neill
817 P.2d 500 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1991)