Van Zandt v. Gormley

66 Ill. App. 588, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 749
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedOctober 19, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 66 Ill. App. 588 (Van Zandt v. Gormley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Zandt v. Gormley, 66 Ill. App. 588, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 749 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

April 25, 1896, the appellant entered judgment upon notes against the appellee, by confession under- warrants of attorney.

April 27, 1896, the appellee moved the court to set aside the judgment and permit him to plead, which motion, being continued until May 23, 1896, was then granted, and the appellee pleaded. The cause being in this condition, the court allowed this appeal, which on motion of the appellee is now dismissed.

There is no final judgment. The cause is pending at the Circuit. Dean v. Gerlach, 34 Ill. App. 234; Mast Buggy Co. v. Litchfield Imp. Co., 55 Ill. App. 98; Roseland Mfg. Co. v. Arcan, 55 Ill. App. 336.

In the cases cited by the appellant—Stein v. Good, 16 Ill. App. 516, and Hempstead v. Humphrey, 38 HI. 90—it does not appear that any question as to the right to appeal was considered. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

H. J. Andrews & Co. v. Anchor Folding Box Manufacturing Co.
210 Ill. App. 636 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 Ill. App. 588, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-zandt-v-gormley-illappct-1896.