Van Wright v. Hornbeck Offshore Services, LLC

E.D. Louisiana

Van Wright v. Hornbeck Offshore Services, LLC

DecidedMay 10, 2021

Docket2:19-cv-13426

StatusUnknown

This text of Van Wright v. Hornbeck Offshore Services, LLC (Van Wright v. Hornbeck Offshore Services, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Wright v. Hornbeck Offshore Services, LLC, (E.D. La. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

JEFFERY VAN WRIGHT CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NO. 19-13426-WBV-JVM

HORNBECK OFFSHORE SECTION: D(1) SERVICES, LLC, ET AL.

ORDER Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Hornbeck Offshore Services, LLC and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (collectively, “Defendants”).1 Plaintiff opposes the Motion,2 and Defendants have filed a Reply.3 Because the Court finds that there are genuine issues of material fact in dispute in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment4 is DENIED. The Fifth Circuit has instructed that, “In general, the question whether an alleged tortfeasor exercised reasonable care under the circumstances is appropriately left for the jury to decide.”5 “Thus, a court will grant summary judgment in a negligence case only in ‘rare circumstances.’”6 The Court finds this jurisprudence especially applicable in this case where Defendants dedicate a significant portion of their Motion for Summary Judgment raising questions

1 R. Doc. 43. 2 R. Doc. 59. 3 R. Doc. 70. 4 R. Doc. 43. 5 Callahan v. Gulf Logistics, LLC, 456 Fed.Appx. 385, 391 (5th Cir. 2011) (citing Man Roland, Inc. v. Kreitz Motor Express, Inc., 438 F.3d 476, 482 (5th Cir. 2006); Randolph v. Laeisz, 896 F.2d 964, 971 (5th Cir. 1990)). 6 Parekh v. Argonautica Shipping Investments B.V., Civ. A. No. 16-13731 c/w 16-14729, 2018 WL 295498, at *4 (E.D. La. Jan. 4, 2018) (citing authority) (Morgan, J.). regarding Plaintiff's credibility and casting doubt on the veracity of Plaintiff's claims regarding his December 14, 2018 fall and resulting injuries.? Determinations of credibility are not appropriate for consideration on a motion for summary judgment. Defendants may present relevant evidence regarding such issues during the trial, which will be determined by the jury at the appropriate time. New Orleans, Louisiana, May 10, 2021.

WENDY B. Ine United States District Judge

7 Specifically, Sections IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII of R. Doc. 438-1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

JEFFERY VAN WRIGHT CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NO. 19-13426-WBV-JVM

HORNBECK OFFSHORE SECTION: D(1) SERVICES, LLC, ET AL.

ORDER Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Hornbeck Offshore Services, LLC and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (collectively, “Defendants”).1 Plaintiff opposes the Motion,2 and Defendants have filed a Reply.3 Because the Court finds that there are genuine issues of material fact in dispute in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment4 is DENIED. The Fifth Circuit has instructed that, “In general, the question whether an alleged tortfeasor exercised reasonable care under the circumstances is appropriately left for the jury to decide.”5 “Thus, a court will grant summary judgment in a negligence case only in ‘rare circumstances.’”6 The Court finds this jurisprudence especially applicable in this case where Defendants dedicate a significant portion of their Motion for Summary Judgment raising questions

1 R. Doc. 43. 2 R. Doc. 59. 3 R. Doc. 70. 4 R. Doc. 43. 5 Callahan v. Gulf Logistics, LLC, 456 Fed.Appx. 385, 391 (5th Cir. 2011) (citing Man Roland, Inc. v. Kreitz Motor Express, Inc., 438 F.3d 476, 482 (5th Cir. 2006); Randolph v. Laeisz, 896 F.2d 964, 971 (5th Cir. 1990)). 6 Parekh v. Argonautica Shipping Investments B.V., Civ. A. No. 16-13731 c/w 16-14729, 2018 WL 295498, at *4 (E.D. La. Jan. 4, 2018) (citing authority) (Morgan, J.). regarding Plaintiff's credibility and casting doubt on the veracity of Plaintiff's claims regarding his December 14, 2018 fall and resulting injuries.? Determinations of credibility are not appropriate for consideration on a motion for summary judgment. Defendants may present relevant evidence regarding such issues during the trial, which will be determined by the jury at the appropriate time. New Orleans, Louisiana, May 10, 2021.

WENDY B. Ine United States District Judge

7 Specifically, Sections IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII of R. Doc. 438-1.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Van Wright v. Hornbeck Offshore Services, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-wright-v-hornbeck-offshore-services-llc-laed-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack