Van Winkle v. Ketcham

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 503
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1805
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 503 (Van Winkle v. Ketcham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Winkle v. Ketcham, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 503 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Opinion

THE court decided in this cause that the promissory note of an infant, carrying on trade as an adult, could not be enforced against him by the payee, who had taken it in the course of business, without knowing the defendant’s nonage.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-winkle-v-ketcham-nysupct-1805.