Van Wie v. The Maine

E.D. New York

Van Wie v. The Maine

42 F. 303, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147

DecidedMay 10, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 42 F. 303 (Van Wie v. The Maine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Wie v. The Maine, 42 F. 303, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147 (E.D.N.Y. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Benedict, J.

This is an action to recover of the steam ferry-boat Maine for damages received by the tug-boat Edwin Hawley in a collision which happened on the occasion of the naval display at the centennial [304]*304exhibition of 1889. The two boats were lying near the foot of Wall street, between the steamer Despatch, which had the President and his Cabinet on board, and the New York shore, waiting to see the disembarkation of the President from the Despatch. The tug-boat was lying further up the river than the ferry-boat; both vessels lying bows up the river. The case turns upon the question whether the collision was caused .by the ferry-boat moving up the river against the stern of the tug, lying still ahead of her, or by the tug backing down upon the bow of the Maine, lying still astern of her. Upon this question a great number of witnesses have been called by each side,—some 27 in all, I believe; and I cannot doubt that the clear weight of the evidence is in favor of the position taken by the ferry-boat, that the collision was caused by the backing down of the tug upon the Maine, and not by the Maine’s moving up against the tug. Let the libel be dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benedict, J.

This is an action to recover of the steam ferry-boat Maine for damages received by the tug-boat Edwin Hawley in a collision which happened on the occasion of the naval display at the centennial [304]*304exhibition of 1889. The two boats were lying near the foot of Wall street, between the steamer Despatch, which had the President and his Cabinet on board, and the New York shore, waiting to see the disembarkation of the President from the Despatch. The tug-boat was lying further up the river than the ferry-boat; both vessels lying bows up the river. The case turns upon the question whether the collision was caused .by the ferry-boat moving up the river against the stern of the tug, lying still ahead of her, or by the tug backing down upon the bow of the Maine, lying still astern of her. Upon this question a great number of witnesses have been called by each side,—some 27 in all, I believe; and I cannot doubt that the clear weight of the evidence is in favor of the position taken by the ferry-boat, that the collision was caused by the backing down of the tug upon the Maine, and not by the Maine’s moving up against the tug. Let the libel be dismissed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 F. 303, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-wie-v-the-maine-nyed-1890.