Van Wagner v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.

444 F. App'x 665
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2011·No. No. 11-1204·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Van Wagner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to appeal an interlocutory order issued by the bankruptcy court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Van Wagner seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Wagner v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 444 F. App'x 665 (4th Cir. 2011).

444 F. App'x 665 (Van Wagner v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)