Van Wagener v. Royce

New York Supreme Court

Van Wagener v. Royce

21 N.Y.S. 191, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 935

New York Supreme Court·Decided December 12, 1892·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is a motion for a reargument of "the appeal of the ■defendants in this action. There is a general statement in the affidavit, •upon which the motion is based, that important facts have been overlooked by this court; but there is no specification of such facts, and we ¿know• of none. On the contrary, the case received a careful examination here, as our opinion will show, and a re-examination has disclosed nothing that was overlooked by us. The motion should be denied, with $10.costs.and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYKMAN, J.

This is a motion for a reargument of "the appeal of the ■defendants in this action. There is a general statement in the affidavit, •upon which the motion is based, that important facts have been overlooked by this court; but there is no specification of such facts, and we ¿know• of none. On the contrary, the case received a careful examination here, as our opinion will show, and a re-examination has disclosed nothing that was overlooked by us. The motion should be denied, with $10.costs.and disbursements. All concur.

Van Wagener v. Royce, 21 N.Y.S. 191, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 935 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

21 N.Y.S. 191 (Van Wagener v. Royce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related