Van Wagenen v. Overseers of the poor of Kingston

10 Johns. 56
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1813·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The objection that the general sessions had

no power to make an original- order is fatal. Original jurisdiction was given to the sessions in England, by the statute of 3 Car. I. c. 4. and that statute has never been re-enacted with us. It was resolved by the K. B., in Slater's Case, (Cro. Car. 470.) that before this statute of Charles, the justices, at their sessions, had no authority to meddle in the case of bastardy, until two justices, according to the statute of 18 Elis. c. 3. had made an order therein. In the modern case of The King v. Greaves, (Doug. 632.) the authority of the sessions was traced to the statute of Charles. Our statute (sess. 24. c. 18.) seems to be" a transcript of the British statute, except the single section relating to this subject, in the statute of Charles I.

Order quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Wagenen v. Overseers of the poor of Kingston, 10 Johns. 56 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).

10 Johns. 56 (Van Wagenen v. Overseers of the poor of Kingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coleman v. Rensselaer
44 How. Pr. 368 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
State v. Price
11 N.J.L. 143 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1829)