Van Voorhis v. Gutman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Van Voorhis v. Gutman

195 So. 2d 614

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 1967·No. No. I-70·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Ford v. Magee (2d Cir. 1947) 160 F.2d 457; Matthews v. Matthews (Fla.App.1965) 177 So.2d 497; Klosenski v. Flaherty (Fla.1959) 116 So.2d 767, 82 A.L.R.2d 664; Roess v. Malsby Co., 69 Fla. 15, 67 So. 226.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Ford v. Magee (2d Cir. 1947) 160 F.2d 457; Matthews v. Matthews (Fla.App.1965) 177 So.2d 497; Klosenski v. Flaherty (Fla.1959) 116 So.2d 767, 82 A.L.R.2d 664; Roess v. Malsby Co., 69 Fla. 15, 67 So. 226.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Van Voorhis v. Gutman, 195 So. 2d 614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

195 So. 2d 614 (Van Voorhis v. Gutman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related