Van Voorhis v. Gutman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Van Voorhis v. Gutman

195 So. 2d 614

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 1967

DocketNo. I-70

StatusPublished

This text of 195 So. 2d 614 (Van Voorhis v. Gutman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Voorhis v. Gutman, 195 So. 2d 614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Ford v. Magee (2d Cir. 1947) 160 F.2d 457; Matthews v. Matthews (Fla.App.1965) 177 So.2d 497; Klosenski v. Flaherty (Fla.1959) 116 So.2d 767, 82 A.L.R.2d 664; Roess v. Malsby Co., 69 Fla. 15, 67 So. 226.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Ford v. Magee (2d Cir. 1947) 160 F.2d 457; Matthews v. Matthews (Fla.App.1965) 177 So.2d 497; Klosenski v. Flaherty (Fla.1959) 116 So.2d 767, 82 A.L.R.2d 664; Roess v. Malsby Co., 69 Fla. 15, 67 So. 226.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 So. 2d 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-voorhis-v-gutman-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack