Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Van Voorhis v. Comins

Van Voorhis v. Comins

178 So. 3d 970, 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1015, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18129
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 2015
DocketNo. 5D14-8526
StatusPublished

This text of 178 So. 3d 970 (Van Voorhis v. Comins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Voorhis v. Comins, 178 So. 3d 970, 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1015, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18129 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue in this case is whether'the trial court erred' when it denied Appellant’s motion to. transfer venue from Orange County to Alachua County in this action for defamation based upon posts made in an Internet blog. Because there was no allegation or evidence in the record that the blog was accessed by anyone in Orange County, venue there is improper. Shahnasarian v. Tejedor, 41 So.3d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions that the trial court transfer fhis action to Ala-chua County.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. ■

PALMER, ORFINGER and'TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shahnasarian v. Tejedor
41 So. 3d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 So. 3d 970, 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1015, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-voorhis-v-comins-fladistctapp-2015.