Van Vooren v. Cook

277 A.D.2d 837

This text of 277 A.D.2d 837 (Van Vooren v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Vooren v. Cook, 277 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

Matter dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The order of the Trial Term has referred a question of admissibility of evidence to this court after having discharged the jury and effected a mistrial of the action. Such question was one for the trial court in the first instance. In the absence of a judgment, section 550 of the Civil Practice Act is not authority for the action taken. (See Fine v. Cummins, 260 App. Div. 569, and Syracuse Grade Crossing Comm. v. Wellin Oil Co., 267 App. Div. 21.) All concur. (Review of question of admission of evidence in an action against an incompetent, referred to the Appellate Division for determination by order of Ontario Trial Term, Warner, J.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Love, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fine v. Cummins
260 A.D. 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Syracuse Grade Crossing Commission v. M. A. Wellin Oil Co.
267 A.D. 21 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-vooren-v-cook-nyappdiv-1950.