Van Vooren v. Cook

277 A.D.2d 837

Opinion

Matter dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The order of the Trial Term has referred a question of admissibility of evidence to this court after having discharged the jury and effected a mistrial of the action. Such question was one for the trial court in the first instance. In the absence of a judgment, section 550 of the Civil Practice Act is not authority for the action taken. (See Fine v. Cummins, 260 App. Div. 569, and Syracuse Grade Crossing Comm. v. Wellin Oil Co., 267 App. Div. 21.) All concur. (Review of question of admission of evidence in an action against an incompetent, referred to the Appellate Division for determination by order of Ontario Trial Term, Warner, J.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Love, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Vooren v. Cook, 277 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

277 A.D.2d 837 (Van Vooren v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fine v. Cummins
260 A.D. 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Syracuse Grade Crossing Commission v. M. A. Wellin Oil Co.
267 A.D. 21 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)