Van Velsor v. Van Velsor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Van Velsor v. Van Velsor

120 A.D.2d 584, 501 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56671

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 A.D.2d 584 (Van Velsor v. Van Velsor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Velsor v. Van Velsor, 120 A.D.2d 584, 501 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action in which the defendant moved to amend the child custody provisions of a judgment of divorce between the parties, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), entered January 10, 1985, as awarded plaintiff $8,500 in counsel fees to be paid by him, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, entered July 19, 1985, as granted the plaintiff leave to enter a judgment against him for the $8,500 in counsel fees.

Orders affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in making the award of counsel fees (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Weinstein and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a matrimonial action in which the defendant moved to amend the child custody provisions of a judgment of divorce between the parties, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), entered January 10, 1985, as awarded plaintiff $8,500 in counsel fees to be paid by him, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, entered July 19, 1985, as granted the plaintiff leave to enter a judgment against him for the $8,500 in counsel fees.

Orders affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in making the award of counsel fees (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Weinstein and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 584, 501 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-velsor-v-van-velsor-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack