Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz
107 N.E.2d 82, 304 N.Y. 590, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 838
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: Judgments reversed, counterclaim dismissed and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff, Joseph D. Van Valkenburgh, for the relief prayed for in the complaint subject to the existing easement. (Lutz v. Van Valkenburgh, 274 App. Div. 813), with costs in all courts. [See 304 N. Y. 95.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz, 107 N.E.2d 82, 304 N.Y. 590, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 838 (N.Y. 1952).
107 N.E.2d 82 (Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz
106 N.E.2d 28 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)