Van Valkenberg v. Wilder Steamship Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Van Valkenberg v. Wilder Steamship Co.

9 Haw. 67, 1893 Haw. LEXIS 20

DecidedApril 17, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Haw. 67 (Van Valkenberg v. Wilder Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Valkenberg v. Wilder Steamship Co., 9 Haw. 67, 1893 Haw. LEXIS 20 (haw 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion op the Court, by

Bickerton, J.

Tin's matter comes here on the same reserved questions of law as in the case of M. A. Gonsalves & Company vs. this same defendant. The shipping receipt in this case is in the same form as the one in the Gonsalves & Company case, with the exception of some slight alterations which in our opinion do not in any way effect the construction to be put upon it. We therefore adopt as the opinion of the Court in this case the opinion filed in the case of M. A. Gonsalves & Company vs. Wilder Steamship Company. There is a stipulation made and filed by counsel in this case, that if the exemption is held to be limited to a marine loss, judgment shall be entered for the plaintiff.

Judgment may be entered accordingly for the plaintiff

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion op the Court, by

Bickerton, J.

Tin's matter comes here on the same reserved questions of law as in the case of M. A. Gonsalves & Company vs. this same defendant. The shipping receipt in this case is in the same form as the one in the Gonsalves & Company case, with the exception of some slight alterations which in our opinion do not in any way effect the construction to be put upon it. We therefore adopt as the opinion of the Court in this case the opinion filed in the case of M. A. Gonsalves & Company vs. Wilder Steamship Company. There is a stipulation made and filed by counsel in this case, that if the exemption is held to be limited to a marine loss, judgment shall be entered for the plaintiff.

Judgment may be entered accordingly for the plaintiff

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Haw. 67, 1893 Haw. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-valkenberg-v-wilder-steamship-co-haw-1893.