Van Valkenberg v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Van Valkenberg v. State

1930 OK CR 256, 288 P. 990, 48 Okla. Crim. 22, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 4

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 5, 1930

DocketNo. A-7529.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 256 (Van Valkenberg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Valkenberg v. State, 1930 OK CR 256, 288 P. 990, 48 Okla. Crim. 22, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 4 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of selling one-half pint of whisky to one G. E. Thompson, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and cost, and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days. Prom which judgment the plaintiff in error appealed to this court.

Petition in error and case-made was filed in this court on the 30th day of August, 1929. No brief has been filed by the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.

Where no brief is filed and no- appearance made, this court will presume that the appeal is without merit or has been abandoned. A careful examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. No errors being apparent depriving the appellant of any substantial rights, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of selling one-half pint of whisky to one G. E. Thompson, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and cost, and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days. Prom which judgment the plaintiff in error appealed to this court.

Petition in error and case-made was filed in this court on the 30th day of August, 1929. No brief has been filed by the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.

Where no brief is filed and no- appearance made, this court will presume that the appeal is without merit or has been abandoned. A careful examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. No errors being apparent depriving the appellant of any substantial rights, the cause is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 256, 288 P. 990, 48 Okla. Crim. 22, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-valkenberg-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.