Van v. Unifund CCR, LLC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Van v. Unifund CCR, LLC.

154 So. 3d 522, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 481, 2015 WL 196153

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 16, 2015·No. No. 5D14-4232·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner challenges the denial of his verified motion to disqualify the trial judge. We conclude that the motion was legally sufficient¹ and, accordingly, grant the writ of prohibition. See Barnett v. Barnett, 727 So.2d 311, 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (“While it is well-settled that a judge may form mental impressions and opinions [523]*523during the course of hearing evidence, he or she may not prejudge the case.”).

WRIT GRANTED.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner challenges the denial of his verified motion to disqualify the trial judge. We conclude that the motion was legally sufficient¹ and, accordingly, grant the writ of prohibition. See Barnett v. Barnett, 727 So.2d 311, 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (“While it is well-settled that a judge may form mental impressions and opinions [523]*523during the course of hearing evidence, he or she may not prejudge the case.”).

WRIT GRANTED.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Van v. Unifund CCR, LLC., 154 So. 3d 522, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 481, 2015 WL 196153 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

154 So. 3d 522 (Van v. Unifund CCR, LLC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related