Van Tuyn v. State

736 So. 2d 71, 1999 WL 246744
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 1999·No. No. 98-1429·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

REVISED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Based upon this court’s decision in Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 8d DCA), review granted, 722 So.2d 193 (Fla.1998), the appellant’s petition for writ of error coram nobis was properly denied. In so holding, we certify conflict with Gregersen [72] v. State, 714 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA), review granted, 728 So.2d 205 (Fla.1998).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Tuyn v. State, 736 So. 2d 71, 1999 WL 246744 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

736 So. 2d 71 (Van Tuyn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Tuyn v. State
757 So. 2d 1213 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)