Van Tassel v. Brown
This text of 161 A.D. 940 (Van Tassel v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order modified so as to direct the partition sale to be completed but to permit the defendant Alonzo Brown, upon payment of thirty dollars costs, to interpose an answer setting up the equitable claim, if any, that he might have upon the proceeds of the sale of the property in.suit by reason of any improvements made by him thereon, and as thus modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 A.D. 940, 145 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-tassel-v-brown-nyappdiv-1914.