Van Tassel v. Basic Refractories Corp.

216 A.D. 774
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1926·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The claimant, when the present award, as for total disability, was made, was receiving compensation from the same employer, as for a total disability, under a prior award for a prior accidental injury. Obviously, being already totally disabled, he was incapable of being again totally disabled, and the award in question should not have been made. Any other view would result in the claimant’s receiving from the same employer twice the maximum compensation prescribed by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. As long as the first award stands we think the claimant will be entitled to no further award. The award should be reversed, and matter remitted to the State Industrial Board. All concur. Award reversed and matter remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Tassel v. Basic Refractories Corp., 216 A.D. 774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

216 A.D. 774 (Van Tassel v. Basic Refractories Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Bratton
678 So. 2d 1071 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1995)
Industrial Carving Co. v. Hurst
447 S.W.2d 871 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1969)
Mayti v. Singer Mfg. Co.
184 A.2d 670 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Claim of Wilkosz v. Symington Gould Corp.
14 A.D.2d 408 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Dennis v. Brown
93 So. 2d 584 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Harrington v. Department of Labor & Industries
113 P.2d 518 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)