Van Syckel v. Arsuaga
220 U.S. 601, 31 S. Ct. 716, 55 L. Ed. 603, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1706
This text of 220 U.S. 601 (Van Syckel v. Arsuaga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Van Syckel v. Arsuaga, 220 U.S. 601, 31 S. Ct. 716, 55 L. Ed. 603, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1706 (1911).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. R. R. Co. v. Express Co., 108 U. S. 24, 28; Southern Ry. Co. v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co., 179 U. S. 641, 644; Covington v. First Nat. Bank, 185 U. S. 270, 277; Heike v. United States, 217 U. S. 423, 429. Mr. George H. Lamar and Mr. N. B. K. Pettingill for the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.
108 U.S. 24 (Supreme Court, 1883)
Southern Railway Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
179 U.S. 641 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Heike v. United States
217 U.S. 423 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
220 U.S. 601, 31 S. Ct. 716, 55 L. Ed. 603, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-syckel-v-arsuaga-scotus-1911.