Van Syckel v. Arsuaga
220 U.S. 601, 31 S. Ct. 716, 55 L. Ed. 603, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1706
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Van Syckel v. Arsuaga. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 U.S. 601 →
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. R. R. Co. v. Express Co., 108 U. S. 24, 28; Southern Ry. Co. v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co., 179 U. S. 641, 644; Covington v. First Nat. Bank, 185 U. S. 270, 277; Heike v. United States, 217 U. S. 423, 429. Mr. George H. Lamar and Mr. N. B. K. Pettingill for the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Syckel v. Arsuaga, 220 U.S. 601, 31 S. Ct. 716, 55 L. Ed. 603, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1706 (1911).
220 U.S. 601 (Van Syckel v. Arsuaga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.
108 U.S. 24 (Supreme Court, 1883)
Southern Railway Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
179 U.S. 641 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Heike v. United States
217 U.S. 423 (Supreme Court, 1910)