Van Smith v. Coleman
This text of 1915 OK 665 (Van Smith v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This cause was filed in this court on August 14, 1913, and was submitted on September 13, 1915. The plaintiff in error has filed no briefs, *372 nor asked for any extension of time within which to do so, nor given any excuse for failure to comply with rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). The defendants in error have filed a motion, service of which was duly accepted by counsel for plaintiff in error, to affirm judgment. We have examined the record and case-made, and see no reason why the motion should not be granted.
We therefore recommend that the judgment be affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1915 OK 665, 151 P. 1018, 51 Okla. 371, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-smith-v-coleman-okla-1915.