Van Smith v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Van Smith v. Coleman

1915 OK 665, 151 P. 1018, 51 Okla. 371, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 990

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 21, 1915·No. 5468·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

DEVEREUX,, C.

This cause was filed in this court on August 14, 1913, and was submitted on September 13, 1915. The plaintiff in error has filed no briefs, *372 nor asked for any extension of time within which to do so, nor given any excuse for failure to comply with rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). The defendants in error have filed a motion, service of which was duly accepted by counsel for plaintiff in error, to affirm judgment. We have examined the record and case-made, and see no reason why the motion should not be granted.

We therefore recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

DEVEREUX,, C.

This cause was filed in this court on August 14, 1913, and was submitted on September 13, 1915. The plaintiff in error has filed no briefs, *372 nor asked for any extension of time within which to do so, nor given any excuse for failure to comply with rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). The defendants in error have filed a motion, service of which was duly accepted by counsel for plaintiff in error, to affirm judgment. We have examined the record and case-made, and see no reason why the motion should not be granted.

We therefore recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Van Smith v. Coleman, 1915 OK 665, 151 P. 1018, 51 Okla. 371, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 990 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

1915 OK 665 (Van Smith v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related