Van Slyck v. Kimball
8 Johns. 198
Opinion
A covenant “ to indemnify and save harmless from all demands, dues and damages whatsoever, which might happen or arise on account of a certain mortgage,” is tantamount to a covenant for quiet enjoyment against the mortgage, and the plaintiff must show an eviction under the mortgage. The case comes within the principle of the decisions in Waldron v. McCarty, (3 Johns. Rep. 471.) and of Kortz v. Carpenter. (S Johns. Rep. 120.) Judgment must be rendered "for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Slyck v. Kimball, 8 Johns. 198 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).
8 Johns. 198 (Van Slyck v. Kimball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tryon v. Jennings
12 Abb. Pr. 33 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1861)
McNeil v. Magee
16 F. Cas. 326 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1829)
Rockfeller v. Donnelly
8 Cow. 623 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1826)
Trustees of Newburgh v. Galatian
4 Cow. 340 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Marston v. Hobbs
2 Mass. 433 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1807)