Van Sickell v. Margolis
262 A.2d 203, 55 N.J. 355, 1970 N.J. LEXIS 154
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion per curiam in the Appellate Division, 109 N. J. Super. 14.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hane-man — 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Sickell v. Margolis, 262 A.2d 203, 55 N.J. 355, 1970 N.J. LEXIS 154 (N.J. 1970).
262 A.2d 203 (Van Sickell v. Margolis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Higgins v. Thurber
992 A.2d 50 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2010)
Shankman v. State
876 A.2d 269 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2005)