Van Sickell v. Margolis
262 A.2d 203, 55 N.J. 355, 1970 N.J. LEXIS 154
This text of 262 A.2d 203 (Van Sickell v. Margolis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Van Sickell v. Margolis, 262 A.2d 203, 55 N.J. 355, 1970 N.J. LEXIS 154 (N.J. 1970).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion per curiam in the Appellate Division, 109 N. J. Super. 14.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hane-man — 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Higgins v. Thurber
992 A.2d 50 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2010)
Shankman v. State
876 A.2d 269 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
262 A.2d 203, 55 N.J. 355, 1970 N.J. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-sickell-v-margolis-nj-1970.