Van Scoy v. State
This text of 568 So. 2d 395 (Van Scoy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON RETURN TO REMAND
This cause was remanded to the trial court for a hearing in accordance with Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609 (Ala.1987). The trial court has returned its findings of-fact, it concluded that the district attorney did not present racially neutral explanations for its strikes against black members of the venire in accordance with Ex parte Branch, supra. Therefore, the trial court has granted a mistrial. As the trial court was in the best position to make this determination, and no error in judgment is apparent on the face of the record, this appeal is dismissed. See Scales v. State, 539 So.2d 1074 (Ala.1988).
OPINION EXTENDED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
568 So. 2d 395, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 184, 1990 WL 68616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-scoy-v-state-alacrimapp-1990.