Van Scoy v. State

568 So. 2d 395, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 184, 1990 WL 68616
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Van Scoy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 24
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided April 12, 1990·No. 8 Div. 740·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMillan, judge.

This cause was remanded to the trial court for a hearing in accordance with Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609 (Ala.1987). The trial court has returned its findings of-fact, it concluded that the district attorney did not present racially neutral explanations for its strikes against black members of the venire in accordance with Ex parte Branch, supra. Therefore, the trial court has granted a mistrial. As the trial court was in the best position to make this determination, and no error in judgment is apparent on the face of the record, this appeal is dismissed. See Scales v. State, 539 So.2d 1074 (Ala.1988).

OPINION EXTENDED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Scoy v. State, 568 So. 2d 395, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 184, 1990 WL 68616 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

568 So. 2d 395 (Van Scoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte State
539 So. 2d 1074 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)
Ex Parte Branch
526 So. 2d 609 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1987)