Van Scoy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Van Scoy v. State

555 So. 2d 195, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 24, 1988 WL 30434

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 8, 1988·No. 8 Div. 740·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING AND RULE 39(k) MOTION

McMILLAN, Judge.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court decision in Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609, modified on rehearing [Ms. 86-500, Dec. 4, 1987] (Ala.1987), this cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct proceedings consistent with the guidelines adopted in the Branch opinion. The trial court is instructed to file findings of facts and conclusions with this Court within a reasonable time after the entry of this remand.

APPLICATION GRANTED; ORIGINAL DECISION OF AFFIRMANCE SET ASIDE; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING AND RULE 39(k) MOTION

McMILLAN, Judge.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court decision in Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609, modified on rehearing [Ms. 86-500, Dec. 4, 1987] (Ala.1987), this cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct proceedings consistent with the guidelines adopted in the Branch opinion. The trial court is instructed to file findings of facts and conclusions with this Court within a reasonable time after the entry of this remand.

APPLICATION GRANTED; ORIGINAL DECISION OF AFFIRMANCE SET ASIDE; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Van Scoy v. State, 555 So. 2d 195, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 24, 1988 WL 30434 (Ala. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

555 So. 2d 195 (Van Scoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related