Van Schoonhoven v. Van Schoonhoven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Van Schoonhoven v. Van Schoonhoven

12 A.D.2d 1003, 211 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12498

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 1003 (Van Schoonhoven v. Van Schoonhoven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Schoonhoven v. Van Schoonhoven, 12 A.D.2d 1003, 211 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Unless the parties agree upon a reference, a motion for a preference for a trial by the court should be granted if either party applies therefor. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term giving exclusive occupancy of home of the parties to plaintiff and her children, directing defendant to pay all expenses of its maintenance, plus temporary alimony and counsel fees.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Unless the parties agree upon a reference, a motion for a preference for a trial by the court should be granted if either party applies therefor. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term giving exclusive occupancy of home of the parties to plaintiff and her children, directing defendant to pay all expenses of its maintenance, plus temporary alimony and counsel fees.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 1003, 211 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-schoonhoven-v-van-schoonhoven-nyappdiv-1961.