Van Schaick v. Wannemacher
5 A. 31, 1 Sadler 408, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 795
Opinion
There is no error in the rulings of the court as to the law applicable to this case. It depended on the finding of facts. They were well submitted to the jury, and no cause .for disturbing the verdict is shown.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Schaick v. Wannemacher, 5 A. 31, 1 Sadler 408, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 795 (Pa. 1886).
5 A. 31 (Van Schaick v. Wannemacher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Central Maine Medical Center v. Burwell
210 F. Supp. 3d 234 (D. Maine, 2016)
Bergstrom v. Spellman
3 Pelt. 319 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1919)
Rhodes v. Black
34 La. 406 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1882)
Nieman v. Coudran
1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 225 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1880)