Van Sant Trust Co. v. Hamilton
This text of 198 N.W. 290 (Van Sant Trust Co. v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action to foreclose the mortgage which plaintiffs still have on the land in question, under the circumstances referred to in Lindholm v. Hamilton, which case immediately precedes this.
Plaintiff was adjudged entitled to a foreclosure, but its mortgage was subordinated to the mechanic’s lien sustained in the other case. For the reasons indicated therein the judgment here appealed from must be affirmed.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 N.W. 290, 159 Minn. 85, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-sant-trust-co-v-hamilton-minn-1924.