Van Riper v. Williams

2 N.J. Eq. 407
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedApril 15, 1841
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 N.J. Eq. 407 (Van Riper v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Riper v. Williams, 2 N.J. Eq. 407 (N.J. Ct. App. 1841).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

As the mortgage sought to be foreclosed in this case, was given to secure the purchase money on land sold by the mortgagees, with covenants of seizin and against incumbrances, and it turns out that there was at the time of the conveyance an outstanding mortgage which still remains an incumbrance upon the premises, that mortgage must be first removed before a decree for foreclosure and sale can in equity be ordered; or, so much of the proceeds of the sale as may be necessary for that purpose, must by the decree be directed to be applied to pay off and satisfy that incumbrance, and the amount so applied deducted from the mortgage debt due the complainant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodward v. Harlin
39 S.W.2d 9 (Texas Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.J. Eq. 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-riper-v-williams-njch-1841.