Van Riper v. Interstate Packaging, Inc.

874 N.W.2d 242, 2016 Minn. LEXIS 24, 2016 WL 424672
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 27, 2016
DocketNo. A15-1156
StatusPublished

This text of 874 N.W.2d 242 (Van Riper v. Interstate Packaging, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Riper v. Interstate Packaging, Inc., 874 N.W.2d 242, 2016 Minn. LEXIS 24, 2016 WL 424672 (Mich. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on June 26, 2015, be,. and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value "because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees-.

BY THE COURT: •

/s/_-Natalie E. Hudson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
874 N.W.2d 242, 2016 Minn. LEXIS 24, 2016 WL 424672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-riper-v-interstate-packaging-inc-minn-2016.