Van Rensselaer v. Petrie
2 How. Pr. 94
This text of 2 How. Pr. 94 (Van Rensselaer v. Petrie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Van Rensselaer v. Petrie, 2 How. Pr. 94 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).
Opinion
Held, that the declarations were not personally served; they should have been given or offered to the defendant, within his reach, or laid down within Ms reach,
Motion granted without costs. '
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chester v. Graves
166 S.W. 998 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1914)
City of Watertown v. Robinson
34 N.W. 139 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1887)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 How. Pr. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-rensselaer-v-petrie-nysupct-1846.