Van Poyck v. State
721 So. 2d 321, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11663, 1998 WL 618572
Opinion
We view the present application for post-conviction relief as one which arises under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See State v. Evans, 705 So.2d 631, 632 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Wall v. State, 525 So.2d 486, 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The motion is time barred, and without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Poyck v. State, 721 So. 2d 321, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11663, 1998 WL 618572 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
721 So. 2d 321 (Van Poyck v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wall v. State
525 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Evans
705 So. 2d 631 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)