Van Poyck v. Florida Department of Corrections

580 So. 2d 319, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4767, 1991 WL 87662
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 1991·No. No. 90-2160·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

William Van Poyck appeals an order of the Director of the Division of Administrative Hearings dismissing, under section 120.56(2), Florida Statutes (1989), his petition challenging Department of Corrections rules relating to inmate confinement. A nearly identical order was reversed and remanded in Bass v. Florida Department of Corrections, 575 So.2d 810 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), involving challenges to the same rules, because appellate review was precluded by the fact that the order was unclear as to the grounds for the dismissal.

In Bass, we relied upon Ramadanovic v. State, 575 So.2d 1333 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), involving challenges to rules relating to inmate access to legal materials, in which we reversed a similar' order and remanded for entry of an order stating with specificity grounds warranting dismissal of the petition, or for further proceedings on the petition pursuant to 120.56(2).

Finding this order similarly deficient, we REVERSE and REMAND with the same instructions as in Bass and Ramadanovic.

NIMMONS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Poyck v. Florida Department of Corrections, 580 So. 2d 319, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4767, 1991 WL 87662 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

580 So. 2d 319 (Van Poyck v. Florida Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Department of Corrections v. Van Poyck
610 So. 2d 1333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)