Van Patten v. Wank

102 S.W. 371, 82 Ark. 547, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 386
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 29, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 102 S.W. 371 (Van Patten v. Wank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Patten v. Wank, 102 S.W. 371, 82 Ark. 547, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 386 (Ark. 1907).

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The abstract of the appellant in this case is so deficient that the court is unable to ascertain the facts without exploring the record, which the oourt must decline' to do, as explained in Ruble v. Helm, 57 Ark. 304. See also applications to this rule in the following cases: Shorter University v. Franklin, 75 Ark. 571; Beavers v. Security Mutual Ins. Co., 76 Ark. 138.

For these reasons the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hubbert v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
206 S.W. 69 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1918)
Baker v. Cazort
112 S.W. 890 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.W. 371, 82 Ark. 547, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-patten-v-wank-ark-1907.