Van Orden v. Schlier

New York Supreme Court

Van Orden v. Schlier

4 N.Y. St. Rep. 889

New York Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1886·Published

Opinion

Dykman, J.

This is an action for the foreclosure of a contract, and the plaintiffs have been awarded a judgment for the relief demanded in the complaint from which the defendant Schlier has appealed.

The findings of fact are in favor of the plaintiffs and strongly against the appellant, and we find them all well supported by the evidence.

The motion to dismiss the complaint was properly denied and there are no errors of law disclosed by the record.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykman, J.

This is an action for the foreclosure of a contract, and the plaintiffs have been awarded a judgment for the relief demanded in the complaint from which the defendant Schlier has appealed.

The findings of fact are in favor of the plaintiffs and strongly against the appellant, and we find them all well supported by the evidence.

The motion to dismiss the complaint was properly denied and there are no errors of law disclosed by the record.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Van Orden v. Schlier, 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 889 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).

Pincite

4 N.Y. St. Rep. 889 (Van Orden v. Schlier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.