Van Nostrand v. Mansfield
This text of 16 Wis. 224 (Van Nostrand v. Mansfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
Appeal from a judgment of foreclosure and sale. The mortgage was executed after the enactment of the statute giving a right of redemption within one year after the sale, Laws 1859, chap. 195. The judgment is in the form heretofore used, when there was no redemption after sale, and unconditionally bars all right and equity of redemption of the defendants in the premises. Upon the authority of Jones vs. Gilman, 14 Wis., 450, it is irregular and cannot stand. In that case we modified the judgment, by inserting a provision giving the defendant aright to redeem within a year from the sale. But as it does not appear that any steps have been taken to execute the judgment here, and as the delay in the plaintiff’s proceedings will be nearly the same, whichever course is pursued, we will reverse the judgment and remand the cause, with directions that the proper judgment be entered in the court below.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Wis. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-nostrand-v-mansfield-wis-1862.