Van Norden v. Kliternick

181 A.D.2d 535, 581 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3697

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered April 12, 1990, which declared [536] that third-party defendant is not obligated to defend or indemnify third-party plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The evidence adduced at trial supports the finding that the vehicle involved in the accident was being used to carry persons for a fee, an occurrence clearly within the exclusionary clause relied on by third-party defendant (see, Government Employees Ins. Co. v Kligler, 42 NY2d 863). The "public or livery conveyance” exclusion herein differs from the "limited, special use” to which such an exclusion would not apply (compare, American Fid. Fire Ins. Co. v Pardo, 32 AD2d 536, 537). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Norden v. Kliternick, 181 A.D.2d 535, 581 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

181 A.D.2d 535 (Van Norden v. Kliternick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Government Employees Insurance v. Kligler
366 N.E.2d 865 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Pardo
32 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)