Van Nooten v. Lawrence

19 A.D.3d 503, 796 N.Y.S.2d 244, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6582

This text of 19 A.D.3d 503 (Van Nooten v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Nooten v. Lawrence, 19 A.D.3d 503, 796 N.Y.S.2d 244, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated August 4, 2004, which, after a hearing, awarded custody of the parties’ child to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding custody of the child to the father (see Matter of Ebert v Ebert, 38 NY2d 700 [1976]). Cozier, J.E, Ritter, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ebert v. Ebert
346 N.E.2d 240 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.D.3d 503, 796 N.Y.S.2d 244, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-nooten-v-lawrence-nyappdiv-2005.