Van Nooten v. Lawrence

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Van Nooten v. Lawrence

19 A.D.3d 503, 796 N.Y.S.2d 244, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6582

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 2005·Published

Opinion

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated August 4, 2004, which, after a hearing, awarded custody of the parties’ child to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding custody of the child to the father (see Matter of Ebert v Ebert, 38 NY2d 700 [1976]). Cozier, J.E, Ritter, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated August 4, 2004, which, after a hearing, awarded custody of the parties’ child to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding custody of the child to the father (see Matter of Ebert v Ebert, 38 NY2d 700 [1976]). Cozier, J.E, Ritter, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Van Nooten v. Lawrence, 19 A.D.3d 503, 796 N.Y.S.2d 244, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

19 A.D.3d 503 (Van Nooten v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related