Van Nest v. Hirsch
93 A. 568, 87 N.J.L. 336, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 233
Opinion
The judgment of the court below will be affirmed for the reasons stated in its per curiam.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Black, Bogert, Ybedenbuegh, White, Herpextteimer, Williams, JJ. 11.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Nest v. Hirsch, 93 A. 568, 87 N.J.L. 336, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 233 (N.J. 1915).
93 A. 568 (Van Nest v. Hirsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.