Van Meter v. Van Meter
231 So. 2d 524
Opinion
This is a homestead law matter. The decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, 214 So.2d 639 (1968), adequately discloses the pertinent facts.
After hearing oral argument, and after considering the briefs and the record arising out of this cause, we have come to the conclusion that the District Court properly decided the case. The judgment of the District Court is, therefore, approved and the writ heretofore issued is hereby discharged. .
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Meter v. Van Meter, 231 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1970).
231 So. 2d 524 (Van Meter v. Van Meter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cutler v. Cutler
994 So. 2d 341 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
DeMayo v. Chames
934 So. 2d 548 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Vickers v. Pelsey
779 So. 2d 629 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
In Re Estate of Scholtz
525 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Bass v. Carlson
419 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Matter of Cooke
412 So. 2d 340 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Burdick v. Burdick
399 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Killian v. Lawson
362 So. 2d 1007 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Teplitz v. Commissioner
1978 T.C. Memo. 45 (U.S. Tax Court, 1978)
Jablonski v. Caputo
297 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Estate of Deem v. Shinn
297 So. 2d 611 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Anderson v. Hendrickson
286 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)