Van Loenen v. Gillespie

California Supreme Court

Van Loenen v. Gillespie

96 P. 87, 152 Cal. 222, 1907 Cal. LEXIS 332

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 22, 1907

DocketL.A. No. 1770.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 96 P. 87 (Van Loenen v. Gillespie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Loenen v. Gillespie, 96 P. 87, 152 Cal. 222, 1907 Cal. LEXIS 332 (Cal. 1907).

Pincite

Opinions

THE COURT.

It is ordered that the opinion heretofore rendered by this court in Department Two in this case is adopted as the opinion by the court in Bank, and judgment affirmed accordingly.

Shaw, J., and Lorigan, J., dissented for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Woollacott v. Meekins, 151 Cal. 701, heretofore denied by the court in Bank:—

The following is the opinion of Department Two, rendered on the fourth day of April, 1907, and adopted by the court in Bank:—

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

It is ordered that the opinion heretofore rendered by this court in Department Two in this case is adopted as the opinion by the court in Bank, and judgment affirmed accordingly.

Shaw, J., and Lorigan, J., dissented for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Woollacott v. Meekins, 151 Cal. 701, heretofore denied by the court in Bank:—

The following is the opinion of Department Two, rendered on the fourth day of April, 1907, and adopted by the court in Bank:—

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 P. 87, 152 Cal. 222, 1907 Cal. LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-loenen-v-gillespie-cal-1907.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack