Van Loan v. Myers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Van Loan v. Myers

271 A.D.2d 848

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 848 (Van Loan v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Loan v. Myers, 271 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

The evidence sufficiently supports the verdict. The recovery was for plaintiff’s commissions earned in his employment by defendant as a licensed broker to produce a buyer for his residence property. .The evidence sustains a finding that plaintiff produced a buyer ready, able, and willing to buy upon price and terms satisfactory to defendant. The fact that the parties agreed that the date of closing and delivery of possession would be when defendant had found another satisfactory place of abode was a sufficient meeting of their minds upon that feature of the terms of sale, to render the broker’s commissions earned, such [849]*849event having occurred within a reasonable time after the arrangement was made. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Heffeman, Brewster, Foster and Lawrence, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents, and votes to reverse and for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The evidence sufficiently supports the verdict. The recovery was for plaintiff’s commissions earned in his employment by defendant as a licensed broker to produce a buyer for his residence property. .The evidence sustains a finding that plaintiff produced a buyer ready, able, and willing to buy upon price and terms satisfactory to defendant. The fact that the parties agreed that the date of closing and delivery of possession would be when defendant had found another satisfactory place of abode was a sufficient meeting of their minds upon that feature of the terms of sale, to render the broker’s commissions earned, such [849]*849event having occurred within a reasonable time after the arrangement was made. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Heffeman, Brewster, Foster and Lawrence, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents, and votes to reverse and for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-loan-v-myers-nyappdiv-1946.