Van Lew v. King

New York Supreme Court

Van Lew v. King

3 Cow. 375

New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1824·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

This Court,

adopted the reasoning of Judge Irving in the. Court below; and gave their opinion that he was right in allowing the plaintiffs their costs ; that as to all actions in which the plaintiff recovers upwards of 25 and less than $50, though they be cognizable before a Justice, the Common Pleas of the city of New-York has concurrent jurisdiction, not only of the subject matter, but of the costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This Court,

adopted the reasoning of Judge Irving in the. Court below; and gave their opinion that he was right in allowing the plaintiffs their costs ; that as to all actions in which the plaintiff recovers upwards of 25 and less than $50, though they be cognizable before a Justice, the Common Pleas of the city of New-York has concurrent jurisdiction, not only of the subject matter, but of the costs.

Van Lew v. King, 3 Cow. 375 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

Pincite

3 Cow. 375 (Van Lew v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related