Van Kirk Vs. Clark Cty.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ROBERT VAN KIRK, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 82213 Appellant, vs. CLARK COUNTY; AND CLARK FILED COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, CODE JAN 0 8 2021 ENFORCEMENT UNIT, PUBLIC EUZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
RESPONSE OFFICE,
BY
Respondents. DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This appeal was docketed on December 14, 2020, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 10 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(0(2).
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
cc: Hon_ Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge Wiley Petersen Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF
NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
10I-1447
011-00.57q
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Kirk Vs. Clark Cty. (Van Kirk Vs. Clark Cty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.