Van Kirk Vs. Clark Cty.

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 8, 2021·No. 82213·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ROBERT VAN KIRK, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 82213 Appellant, vs. CLARK COUNTY; AND CLARK FILED COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, CODE JAN 0 8 2021 ENFORCEMENT UNIT, PUBLIC EUZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

RESPONSE OFFICE,

BY

Respondents. DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This appeal was docketed on December 14, 2020, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 10 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(0(2).

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN

cc: Hon_ Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge Wiley Petersen Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF

NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

10I-1447

011-00.57q

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Kirk Vs. Clark Cty., (Neb. 2021).

Van Kirk Vs. Clark Cty. (Van Kirk Vs. Clark Cty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.