Van Keuren & Son v. Martin

15 A.2d 278, 18 N.J. Misc. 581, 1940 N.J. Misc. LEXIS 98
CourtNew Jersey Tax Court
DecidedSeptember 24, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 A.2d 278 (Van Keuren & Son v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Keuren & Son v. Martin, 15 A.2d 278, 18 N.J. Misc. 581, 1940 N.J. Misc. LEXIS 98 (N.J. Super. Ct. 1940).

Opinion

Quinn, President.

Petitioner seeks a reduction of its corporation franchise tax for the year 1939 from the sum of [582]*582$193.50 to $50, -upon the ground that its issued capital stock outstanding, upon which the tax is computed (R. S. 54:13-6; N. J. S. A. 54:13-6), was duly reduced by the company in 1934 from 193,500 shares to 50,000 shares. It appears, however, that no certificate of reduction was ever filed with the secretary of state, as is required by the General Corporation act. R. S. 14:11-2; N. J. S. A. 14:11-2. This is fatal to the present claim for credit on account of such reduction. Vulcan Wheels, Inc., v. State Tax Commissioner, New Jersey Tax Reports, 1912-1934, p. 691.

Assessment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A. B. Frank Co. v. Latham
190 S.W.2d 739 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.2d 278, 18 N.J. Misc. 581, 1940 N.J. Misc. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-keuren-son-v-martin-njtaxct-1940.