Van Houten v. Stevenson

66 A. 1134, 69 N.J. Eq. 835, 3 Robb. 835, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 215
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 26, 1905
StatusPublished

This text of 66 A. 1134 (Van Houten v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Houten v. Stevenson, 66 A. 1134, 69 N.J. Eq. 835, 3 Robb. 835, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 215 (N.J. 1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinions of Vice-Chancellors Stevens and Garrison, delivered in the court of chancery in this canse.

For affirmance—-The Chiee-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray—12.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 A. 1134, 69 N.J. Eq. 835, 3 Robb. 835, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-houten-v-stevenson-nj-1905.