Van Houten v. Stevenson
66 A. 1134, 69 N.J. Eq. 835, 3 Robb. 835, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 215
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinions of Vice-Chancellors Stevens and Garrison, delivered in the court of chancery in this canse.
For affirmance—-The Chiee-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray—12.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Houten v. Stevenson, 66 A. 1134, 69 N.J. Eq. 835, 3 Robb. 835, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 215 (N.J. 1905).
66 A. 1134 (Van Houten v. Stevenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.