Van Houten v. Pye

36 N.Y.S. 1134, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 912
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 2, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.Y.S. 1134 (Van Houten v. Pye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Houten v. Pye, 36 N.Y.S. 1134, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 912 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This case was before us at a prior term of this court upon an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant. 33 N. Y. Supp. 838. We reversed that judgment, and laid down the law which was to control the case so far as this court is concerned. As we adhere to the opinion delivered at that time, it is unnecessary to re-examine the case now. The trial court followed our decision, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial on the minutes of the court should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houten v. Pye
33 N.Y.S. 838 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 N.Y.S. 1134, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-houten-v-pye-nysupct-1895.