Van Hook v. Hudson
128 S. Ct. 614, 552 U.S. 1023
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 13, 2007·No. 07-6011·Published·Cited by 30 cases
Opinion
Robert J. VAN HOOK, petitioner,
v.
Stuart HUDSON, Warden.
Supreme Court of United States.
*615 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Hook v. Hudson, 128 S. Ct. 614, 552 U.S. 1023 (U.S. 2007).
128 S. Ct. 614 (Van Hook v. Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sanchez-Anaya
Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2026
Duso v. Groton
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2025
Duso v. Groton (Dissent)
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2025
Piazza v. Kirkbride
827 S.E.2d 479 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2019)
State v. Gentle
817 S.E.2d 833 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
United States v. Murray
298 F. Supp. 3d 859 (U.S. District Court, 2018)
City of Asheville v. State
794 S.E.2d 759 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2016)
State v. Carle
337 P.3d 904 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)
Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01
113 Fed. Cl. 688 (Federal Claims, 2013)
Bond v. Vining Sparks (In re U.S. Mortgage Corp.)
492 B.R. 784 (D. New Jersey, 2013)
United States v. Santistevan
701 F.3d 1289 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. BNP Paribas SA
884 F. Supp. 2d 589 (S.D. Texas, 2012)
State v. Edmonds
47 A.3d 737 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)
King Ex Rel. Harvey-Barrow v. Beaufort County Board of Education
704 S.E.2d 259 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)
Northrop Grumman Computing Systems, Inc. v. United States
93 Fed. Cl. 144 (Federal Claims, 2010)
State v. Fry
2010 Ohio 1017 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Bobby v. Van Hook
558 U.S. 4 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Lamoureux v. AnazaoHealth Corp.
669 F. Supp. 2d 227 (D. Connecticut, 2009)
Van Hook v. Anderson
Sixth Circuit, 2009
Niswander v. Cincinnati Insurance
529 F.3d 714 (Sixth Circuit, 2008)